ANALYSIS OF ELECTROFORMED GLASS SURFACES BY ELECTRON MICROSCOPY: SEM STUDY OF COPPER-COATED ARTISTIC GLASS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2160568Özet
This study analyses the surface of copper-coated
artistic glass produced by electroforming technique,
using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) as the
primary characterisation tool. Non-conductive glass
substrates were rendered conductive with a powdered-
graphite layer and then coated with copper in an acidic
copper-sulphate bath. Two families of experiments
were carried out on 3 × 3 cm × 5 mm tiles: a voltage
series (0.1, 0.2 and 0.3 V) and a current series (0.1, 0.2
and 0.3 A), each at holding times of 25, 50 and 100
minutes, with all other parameters held constant. SEM
imaging of the graphite layer, of every deposition
condition, and of the deposit in profile reveals a
systematic evolution of the copper morphology. At
low-to-moderate driving force (0.1–0.2 V, 0.1 A) with
sufficient time the deposit consists of fine, coalesced,
comparatively smooth grains that form bright,
homogeneous films; at 0.2 V it is densest and most
uniform. As the driving force increases (0.3 V and,
most markedly, 0.2–0.3 A) the copper grows as coarse
three-dimensional botryoidal (cauliflower-like)
spherulites separated by deep crevices, a rough, light-
scattering morphology that corresponds to the dark
and eventually black surfaces observed
macroscopically; a profile view confirms the
columnar, mounded growth habit at high current. A
distinctive methodological feature of the work is the
use of powdered graphite, rather than silver or liquid
copper pastes, as the conductivity layer. The SEM
evidence provides a micro-structural explanation for
the macroscopic colour and texture and yields a
reproducible parameter map that allows the artist to
steer the surface from bright metallic to dark patinated
through voltage or current and time alone.
Referanslar
[1] Electroplating 101: Metal Anodizing and Plating.
Retrieved 29 October 2014.
[2] Miller, P. (1979). Making sculpture by means of
copper electroforming. Leonardo, 12(2), 129–
131. The MIT Press.
[3] Fowle Meleney, K. (2009). Small-Scale
Electroforming for the Studio Artist.
[4] Durney, L. J. (2010). Electroplating Engineering
Handbook (4th ed.). New York: Springer, pp.
15, 474–479.
[5] Kanani, N. (2006). Electroplating: Basic
Principles, Processes and Practice. Berlin:
Elsevier, pp. 12–13, 59–64.
[6] Bray, C. (2001). Dictionary of Glass: Materials
and Techniques. London: A & C Black, p. 108.
[7] Dini, J. W. (1993). Electrodeposition: The
Material Science of Coatings and Substrates.
New Jersey: Noyes Publications, pp. 200–212.
[8] Solé, M. J. S. (1994). Electroforming: methods,
materials and merchandise. Endeavour, 18(1),
29–35.
[9] Pasquale, M. A., Gassa, L. M., & Arvia, A. J.
(2008). Copper electrodeposition from an
acidic plating bath containing accelerating and
inhibiting organic additives. Electrochimica
Acta, 53(20), 5891–5904.
[10] Untracht, O. (1975). Metal Techniques for
Craftsmen. New York: Doubleday, pp. 388–
390.
[11] Lowenheim, F. A. (1978). Electroplating:
Fundamentals of Surface Finishing. New York:
McGraw-Hill.
[12] Manafidizaji, A., & Günkaya, G. (2015).
Artistik cam uygulamalarında
elektrokaplamanın kullanımı [The use of
electroplating in artistic glass applications].
Şişecam Teknik Bülten, 44(1), 107–114. 29th
Glass Symposium Proceedings.
İndir
Yayınlanmış
Nasıl Atıf Yapılır
Sayı
Bölüm
Lisans
Telif Hakkı (c) 2026 International Journal of Art, Fashion, Music and Design

Bu çalışma Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ile lisanslanmıştır.